CALGARY FAMILY ASSESSMENT MODEL: WOMEN IN SITUATIONS OF VIOLENCE AND REVOCATION OF PROTECTIVE MEASURES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: To understand the strengths and weaknesses of the families of women in situations of violence who have had their emergency protective measures revoked. Method: descriptive research based on the Calgary Family Assessment Model, in the context of a Women’s Police Station in a municipality in the interior of São Paulo, Brazil, carried out between September and November 2021, with four families of women who revoked the protective measure. Family structure, development, and functionality data were collected and analyzed according to the Calgary Model. Results: the families have similarities that include socio-economic aspects, low schooling, alcohol use, conflicting family relationships, and transgenerational relationships that, due to their fragility, perpetuate the cycle of violence. However, the social benefits, religious support, and family members were strengths. Conclusion: The Calgary Family Assessment Model guides nurses in proposing care plans consistent with domestic violence’s complexities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it