Evolving Perspectives: the resurgence of wood in Quebec architecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the past two decades, Quebec has undergone a radical transformation in its approach to using wood in architecture, spurred by trade constraints on wood exports to the United States. This evolution is the outcome of synergistic efforts that have facilitated a transition resulting in significant technological and architectural advancements. Historically, Quebec’s vast forest resources have played a pivotal role in the development of local timber construction, particularly through traditional timber frame techniques. However, the 19th century witnessed a shift towards light-frame construction methods like the Balloon Frame, driven by industrialisation and urbanisation. By the mid-20th century, concrete gained dominance, the fruit of prioritising aesthetics over ideology in architectural design, especially in Montreal, where concrete structures flourished. The 1980s trade dispute with the United States marked a turning point, fostering innovation and a paradigm shift in wood use. Collaboration between industry and academia, exemplified by the Krüger Pavilion and the founding of FP Innovations, has propelled large-scale wood construction forward. Cecobois further supports this trend by facilitating access to technological innovations. This era of change highlights both the potential and limitations of wood in architecture, showcasing its role as a versatile and eco-friendly material that can enhance architectural design while facing technical challenges that sometimes limit its visibility and application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".