Generating surface soil moisture at the 30 m resolution in grape-growing areas based on stacked ensemble learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate and timely monitoring of drought conditions in grape-producing regions is crucial for achieving healthy growth of grapes. Current soil moisture (SM) products are primarily available at coarse resolutions (e.g. several to tens of kilometres), constraining its applications at fine scales. Here, we trained a weighted stacking ensemble model including three tree-based models (categorical boosting, random forest, and gradient boosting decision tree), using seven forcing parameters related to spectral reflectance (SR), land surface temperature (LST), and evapotranspiration (ET), in conjunction with the digital elevation model (DEM) feature. The weighted stacking ensemble model exhibited an average R2 of 0.86 and an average RMSE of 0.021 m3/m3 in simulating SM in the vegetive stage and the mid-ripening stage of grape. Then we generated high spatiotemporal downscaled SM (HSM) data at a grape growing area at high spatiotemporal resolutions (30 m, 8-day) from 2009 to 2018. Our HSM dataset demonstrated strong spatial, seasonal and interannual dynamics that align with 500 m SM dataset derived from single MODIS data, and the HSM dataset shows more details in SM distribution. Additionally, the SM time series in the HSM is consistently correlated with drought events, offering intricate spatiotemporal information for drought monitoring. The application of downscaled SM results identified a concentration of drought events in the eastern foothills of the Helan Mountains, particularly severe drought conditions were observed in the Hongsipu production area. Drought occurrences in the Hongsipu production area ranged from 90% to 91% during May and June, decreasing to 73% and 41% in July and August, respectively. These findings significantly contribute to enhancing high spatiotemporal SM monitoring capabilities, offering valuable guidance for timely water management in grape-growing regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".