MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400893486 · doi:10.1136/jnis-2024-snis.182

E-077 Thrombectomy in elderly stroke patients presenting with low ASPECTS: insights from STAR registry

2024· article· en· W4400893486 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zachary Hubbard, Christopher L. Cunningham, Sameh Samir Elawady, Rahim Abo Kasem, J Isidor, Hidetoshi Matsukawa, I Maier, P Jabbour, J Kim, S Quintero Wolfe, A Rai, R Starke, M Psychogios, E Samaniego, N Goyal, S Yoshimura, H Cuellar, J Grossberg, A Alawieh, Ali Alaraj, Mohamad Ezzeldin, D Romano, Omar Tanweer, Justin Mascitelli, I Fragata, A Polifka, Fazeel Siddiqui, J Osbun, Ramesh Grandhi, R Crosa, C Matouk, M Park, M Levitt, Waleed Brinjikji, M Moss, Ergün Dağlıoğlu, R Williamson, Pedro Navía, P Kan, R De Leacy, S Chowdhry, David Altschul, A Spiotta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStar (game theory)Stroke (engine)MedicineComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringAstrophysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Four recent randomized controlled trials demonstrated the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion acute ischemic strokes (LVO-AIS) patients presenting with low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). However, these trials included very few patients aged over 80 years. In this study we aim to investigate whether elderly ischemic LVO-AIS patients with low ASPECTS benefit from MT. Methods This study used the data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR), a prospectively maintained database of 49 thrombectomy-capable stroke centers in the US, Europe, and Asia between 2013 and 2023. LVO-AIS patients ≥ 80-year-old presenting with ASPECTS ≤ 5, who underwent MT for internal carotid artery (ICA), M1, or M2 segments of middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. The primary outcome was 90-day favorable outcomes, defined as modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0–3. Secondary outcomes included modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score, 90-day mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Results Among the 10,229 patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy, 101 met the inclusion criteria. Successful recanalization was achieved in 81 (80.2%) of patients. 19 (18.8%) patients experienced 90-day favorable outcomes, with 8 (7.9%) achieving an mRS score of 0–2. sICH occurred in 14 (13.9%) patients, and the 90-day mortality rate was 49.5%. Only 1 patient (5.6%) ≥ 90 years achieved a favorable outcome at 90 days, while 11 patients (21.2%) aged 80–84 years and 7 patients (22.5%) aged 85–89 did. Among all patients aged ≥ 80 years, multivariate analysis identified higher ASPECTS (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09 - 1.35; p < 0.001) as a predictor of 90-day favorable outcome, but it is not associated with 90-day mortality (aOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93 - 1.12; p = 0.70). Conclusion Our study highlights the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy for elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years presenting with low ASPECTS. However, for individuals aged ≥ 90 years, the decision to proceed with thrombectomy should be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis. Disclosures Z. Hubbard: None. C. Cunningham: None. S. Elawady: None. R. Abo Kasem: None. J. Isidor: None. H. Matsukawa: None. I. Maier: 3; C; speakers honoraria from Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb. P. Jabbour: None. J. Kim: None. S. Quintero Wolfe: None. A. Rai: None. R. Starke: 1; C; RMS research is supported by the NREF, Joe Niekro Foundation, Brain Aneurysm Foundation, Bee Foundation, Department of Health Biomedical Research Grant (21K02AWD-007000) and by National Institute of H. M. Psychogios: 1; C; Grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) for the DISTAL trial (33IC30_198783) and TECNO trial (32003B_204977), Grant from Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung for the DISTAL trial. Unrestricted Gr. E. Samaniego: 2; C; consults for Medtronic, microvention, Rapid Medical. N. Goyal: None. S. Yoshimura: 3; C; lecture fee from Stryker, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, Kaneka Medics. H. Cuellar: 2; C; Consultant for Medtronic and Microvention. J. Grossberg: 1; C; Georgia Research Alliance, Emory Medical Care Foundation, Neurosurgery Catalyst,. 2; C; Consultant: Cognition, Imperative Care. A. Alawieh: None. A. Alaraj: 2; C; Consultant for Cerenovus. M. Ezzeldin: 2; C; Consultant for Viz.ai and Imperative care. 4; C; Investments in Galaxy Therapeutics. D. Romano: 2; C; Consultant for Penumbra, Balt, Microvention, Phenox. O. Tanweer: 1; C; Consulting Agreements: Viz.AI, Inc., Penumbra, Inc, Balt, Inc, Stryker Inc, Imperative Inc. J. Mascitelli: None. I. Fragata: None. A. Polifka: None. F. Siddiqui: None. J. Osbun: None. R. Grandhi: 2; C; Consultant for Balt Neurovascular, Cerenovus, Medtronic Neurovascular, Rapid Medical, and Stryker Neurovascular. R. Crosa: None. C. Matouk: 1; C; Contact PI for NIH Grant R21NS128641. 2; C; Consultant for Stryker, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, and Silk Road Medical. 3; C; Speaker for Penumbra and Silk Road Medical. M. Park: 2; C; Medtronic. M. Levitt: 1; C; Unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic and Stryker. 2; C; consulting agreement with Medtronic, Aeaean Advisers and Metis Innovative. 4; C; equity interest in Proprio, Stroke Diagnostics, Apertur, Stereotaxis, Fluid Biomed, and Hyperion Surgical. W. Brinjikji: 2; C; Medtronic, Stryker, Imperative Care, Microvention, MIVI Neurovascular, Cerenovus, Asahi, and Balt. 4; C; Nested Knowledge, Superior Medical Editors, Piraeus Medical, Sonoris Medical, and MIVI Neurovascular. M. Moss: None. E. Daglioglu: None. R. Williamson Jr.: 2; C; Consultant for Medtronic, Stryker, and Synaptive Medical. P. Navia: 2; C; Consultant for Penumbra, Medtronic, Stryker, Cerenovus and Balt. P. Kan: 1; C; Grants from the NIH (1U18EB029353–01) and unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic and Siemens. 2; C; Consultant for Imperative Care and Stryker Neurovascular. 4; C; Stock ownership in Vena Medical. R. De Leacy: 1; C; Research grants from Siemens Healthineers and Kaneka medical. 2; C; Consultant for Cerenovus, Stryker Neurovascular and Sim & Cure. 4; C; Minor equity interest Vastrax, Borvo medical, Synchron, Endostream, Von Vascular, Radical catheters and Precision Recovery Inc. S. Chowdhry: 2; C; Consultant and proctor for Medtronic and Microvention. D. Altschul: 1; C; Research Support The Bee Foundation. 2; C; Consultant for MicroVention, Stryker, Q’apel, Synchron, and Cerenovus. 4; C; Investor Von Vascular,. A. Spiotta: 2; C; Consultant for Penumbra, Terumo, RapidAI, Cerenovus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→