Mitochondrial functions and fatty acid profiles in fish heart: an insight into physiological limitations linked to thermal tolerance and age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heart failure is among the first major consequences of heat stress in aquatic ectotherms. Mitochondria produce most of the ATP used by the heart and represent almost half of the volume in cardiac cells. It has therefore been hypothesized that mitochondrial dysfunction may be a major cause of heart failure associated with heat stress. The present study aims to investigate if CTmax is linked to the thermal sensitivity of cardiac mitochondria in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), and if it is influenced by heart fatty acid composition and age. To do so, we measured the CTmax of 30 fish. The cardiac mitochondrial oxygen consumption was measured by high resolution respirometry at three temperatures and heart lipid profiles were obtained by gas chromatography (GC) coupled with a flame ionization detector (FID). Fish age was estimated via otolith readings. Fatty acid profiles showed no correlation with CTmax, but EPA levels were higher in older individuals. Mitochondrial respiration was measured in 35 fish using high-resolution respirometry. It was strongly affected by temperature and showed a drastic drop in OXPHOS respiration fed by complex I and complex I+complex II, while uncoupled respiration plateaued at CTmax temperature. Our results suggest that complex I is an important modulator of the impact of temperature on mitochondrial respiration at high temperatures but is not the main limiting factor in physiological conditions (maximal OXPHOS). Mitochondrial respiration was also affected by fish age, showing a general decrease in older individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".