MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400895298 · doi:10.1080/01904167.2024.2380781

Compositional nutrient analysis of greenhouse grown ryegrass ( <i>Lolium multiforum</i> ) fertilized with raw and hydrothermal-treated igneous rock as diagnostic tool for balanced fertilization in tropical environments

2024· article· en· W4400895298 on OpenAlexaff
Aaron Mbissik, Lotfi Khiari, Otmane Raji, Abdellatif Elghali, Muhammad Ouabid, Jean‐Louis Bodinier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plant Nutrition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBanana Cultivation and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIgneous rockHuman fertilizationAgronomyGreenhouseNutrientHydrothermal circulationBiologyEnvironmental scienceLoliumPoaceaeBotanyGeochemistryGeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the escalating demand for conventional potassium sources, and their unavailability in many African countries, there is a growing interest in hydrothermally treated igneous rocks as viable alternatives. These materials exhibit promising potential in enhancing potassium release, comparable to traditional sources like muriate of potash (M.O.P.). However, it remains uncertain whether they can adequately fulfill the nutrient requirements of plants. In this study, we evaluated nutrient balance in ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) using raw and hydrothermally treated K-bearing silicate rocks as fertilizers. The Compositional Nutrient Diagnostic (CND) approach was used to assess the plants’ nutrient status, involving identification of high-yield subpopulations, and setting a yield cutoff. We derived a theoretical threshold for nutrient imbalance (CNDr2) using statistical methods like the chi-square distribution function and low-yield subpopulation proportion. CNDr2 was validated via Cate–Nelson partition and sum of squared individual nutrient indexes. Results showed a yield cutoff of 37.759 kg ha−1, distinguishing low-yield and high-yield subpopulations based on cumulative variance ratio functions from survey data. The theoretical threshold derived using the chi-square function was 10.1, subsequently validated by the Cate–Nelson method. Critical CND nutrient indices were symmetrical around zero, but their sum indicated foliar nutrient imbalance, notably zinc, potassium, and copper excess, attributed to 20 interactions identified (4 synergetic and 16 antagonistic). This study underscores hydrothermal treatment’s efficacy in improving nutrient availability and achieving a balanced nutrient profile compared to raw materials. It offers a promising solution for enhancing agricultural productivity, especially in tropical regions like Africa, where traditional sources are scarce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plant NutritionSame topicBanana Cultivation and ResearchFrench-language works237,207