MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400895658 · doi:10.1111/emed.12728

Une autre histoire. Histoire, temps et passé dans les <i>Vies</i> et <i>Passions</i> latines (IVe–XIe siècle). By Marie‐CélineIsaïa. Paris: Institut de recherche et d’histoire des textes. 2023. 490 pp. €33.50 (print). ISBN 978‐2‐493209‐04‐7 (print); ISBN 978‐2‐493209‐06‐1 (open access ebook).

2024· article· fr· W4400895658 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly Medieval Europe · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionsHumanitiesPhilosophyArtTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Totalling almost 500 pages of tightly packed typeface, Une autre histoire is a monumental work filled with insights.The study analyses approximately eight hundred Latin vitae and passiones composed in western Europe (excluding Iberia) between the fourth and the eleventh century (although typographical errors on the front and back covers of the printed book set the endpoint in the ninth century), accessed in printed editions published between the late sixteenth and the early twenty-first century.Isaa occasionally cites individual manuscripts but never addresses variations in texts across manuscripts or printed editions.She draws primarily on the methodological and/or theoretical statements of the late antique and early medieval 'hagiographers' in question, and secondarily on the emplotments and 'factual' details of their narratives, to explore how those authors created and transmitted 'un modle de rcit historique qui reste inaperu dans les classifications thoriques du savoir' (p.418).Isaa illustrates the details of the model through very many extremely long textual extracts, all in her own (French) translations; she does not include the Latin originals.For Isaa, the type of (previously unnoticed) historical narrative produced by late ancient and early medieval 'hagiographers' constituted 'une histoire alternative, une histoire convaincante et credible [L]es hagiographes fabriquent un pass cohrent, mme s'ils en amnagent la chronologie, en inventent les pisodes et les acteurs et mlent si indistinctement leurs convictions avec les faits' (p.417).She also argues that those 'hagiographers' were conscious of themselves as practitioners of an autonomous discourse of hagiography, distinct fromyet simultaneously intertwined withhistoriography in the complicated and ever-shifting ways laid out in her chapter summaries (pp.23-4).Chapter 1 traces how fifth-, sixth-, and seventh-century vitae and passiones became progressively distinguished from the genre of ecclesiastical history.Chapter 2 discusses how some eighth-and ninthcentury authors (who generally classed themselves as participants in the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it