PCEtoFHIR: Decomposition of Postcoordinated SNOMED CT Expressions for Storage as HL7 FHIR Resources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To ensure interoperability, both structural and semantic standards must be followed. For exchanging medical data between information systems, the structural standard FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) has recently gained popularity. Regarding semantic interoperability, the reference terminology SNOMED Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT), as a semantic standard, allows for postcoordination, offering advantages over many other vocabularies. These postcoordinated expressions (PCEs) make SNOMED CT an expressive and flexible interlingua, allowing for precise coding of medical facts. However, this comes at the cost of increased complexity, as well as challenges in storage and processing. Additionally, the boundary between semantic (terminology) and structural (information model) standards becomes blurred, leading to what is known as the TermInfo problem. Although often viewed critically, the TermInfo overlap can also be explored for its potential benefits, such as enabling flexible transformation of parts of PCEs. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, an alternative solution for storing PCEs is presented, which involves combining them with the FHIR data model. Ultimately, all components of a PCE should be expressible solely through precoordinated concepts that are linked to the appropriate elements of the information model. METHODS: The approach involves storing PCEs decomposed into their components in alignment with FHIR resources. By utilizing the Web Ontology Language (OWL) to generate an OWL ClassExpression, and combining it with an external reasoner and semantic similarity measures, a precoordinated SNOMED CT concept that most accurately describes the PCE is identified as a Superconcept. In addition, the nonmatching attribute relationships between the Superconcept and the PCE are identified as the "Delta." Once SNOMED CT attributes are manually mapped to FHIR elements, FHIRPath expressions can be defined for both the Superconcept and the Delta, allowing the identified precoordinated codes to be stored within FHIR resources. RESULTS: A web application called PCEtoFHIR was developed to implement this approach. In a validation process with 600 randomly selected precoordinated concepts, the formal correctness of the generated OWL ClassExpressions was verified. Additionally, 33 PCEs were used for two separate validation tests. Based on these validations, it was demonstrated that a previously proposed semantic similarity calculation is suitable for determining the Superconcept. Additionally, the 33 PCEs were used to confirm the correct functioning of the entire approach. Furthermore, the FHIR StructureMaps were reviewed and deemed meaningful by FHIR experts. CONCLUSIONS: PCEtoFHIR offers services to decompose PCEs for storage within FHIR resources. When creating structure mappings for specific subdomains of SNOMED CT concepts (eg, allergies) to desired FHIR profiles, the use of SNOMED CT Expression Templates has proven highly effective. Domain experts can create templates with appropriate mappings, which can then be easily reused in a constrained manner by end users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".