MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400898884 · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae623

Interpretable deep residual network uncovers nucleosome positioning and associated features

2024· article· en· W4400898884 on OpenAlexafffund
Yosef Masoudi‐Sobhanzadeh, Shuxiang Li, Yunhui Peng, Anna R. Panchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueNucleic Acids Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer ResearchOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchQueen's University
FundersGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsNucleosomeBiologyHistone octamerHistoneLinker DNAComputational biologyGeneticsEpigeneticsDNADNA sequencingGenomeChromatinDNA methylationGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nucleosomes represent elementary building units of eukaryotic chromosomes and consist of DNA wrapped around a histone octamer flanked by linker DNA segments. Nucleosomes are central in epigenetic pathways and their genomic positioning is associated with regulation of gene expression, DNA replication, DNA methylation and DNA repair, among other functions. Building on prior discoveries that DNA sequences noticeably affect nucleosome positioning, our objective is to identify nucleosome positions and related features across entire genome. Here, we introduce an interpretable framework based on the concepts of deep residual networks (NuPoSe). Trained on high-coverage human experimental MNase-seq data, NuPoSe is able to learn sequence and structural patterns associated with nucleosome organization in human genome. NuPoSe can be also applied to unseen data from different organisms and cell types. Our findings point to 43 informative features, most of them constitute tri-nucleotides, di-nucleotides and one tetra-nucleotide. Most features are significantly associated with the nucleosomal structural characteristics, namely, periodicity of nucleosomal DNA and its location with respect to a histone octamer. Importantly, we show that features derived from the 27 bp linker DNA flanking nucleosomes contribute up to 10% to the quality of the prediction model. This, along with the comprehensive training sets, deep-learning architecture, and feature selection method, may contribute to the NuPoSe's 80-89% classification accuracy on different independent datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNucleic Acids ResearchSame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207