MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400899165 · doi:10.2196/58141

Construction of a Multi-Label Classifier for Extracting Multiple Incident Factors From Medication Incident Reports in Residential Care Facilities: Natural Language Processing Approach

2024· article· en· W4400899165 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hayato Kizaki, Hiroki Satoh, S. Ebara, Satoshi Watabe, Yasufumi Sawada, Shungo Imai, Satoko Hori

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Safety and Medication Errors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncident reportSentenceClassifier (UML)Artificial intelligenceHealth careComputer sciencePatient safetyMedicineComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Medication safety in residential care facilities is a critical concern, particularly when nonmedical staff provide medication assistance. The complex nature of medication-related incidents in these settings, coupled with the psychological impact on health care providers, underscores the need for effective incident analysis and preventive strategies. A thorough understanding of the root causes, typically through incident-report analysis, is essential for mitigating medication-related incidents. Objective We aimed to develop and evaluate a multilabel classifier using natural language processing to identify factors contributing to medication-related incidents using incident report descriptions from residential care facilities, with a focus on incidents involving nonmedical staff. Methods We analyzed 2143 incident reports, comprising 7121 sentences, from residential care facilities in Japan between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016. The incident factors were annotated using sentences based on an established organizational factor model and previous research findings. The following 9 factors were defined: procedure adherence, medicine, resident, resident family, nonmedical staff, medical staff, team, environment, and organizational management. To assess the label criteria, 2 researchers with relevant medical knowledge annotated a subset of 50 reports; the interannotator agreement was measured using Cohen κ. The entire data set was subsequently annotated by 1 researcher. Multiple labels were assigned to each sentence. A multilabel classifier was developed using deep learning models, including 2 Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers (BERT)–type models (Tohoku-BERT and a University of Tokyo Hospital BERT pretrained with Japanese clinical text: UTH-BERT) and an Efficiently Learning Encoder That Classifies Token Replacements Accurately (ELECTRA), pretrained on Japanese text. Both sentence- and report-level training were performed; the performance was evaluated by the F1-score and exact match accuracy through 5-fold cross-validation. Results Among all 7121 sentences, 1167, 694, 2455, 23, 1905, 46, 195, 1104, and 195 included “procedure adherence,” “medicine,” “resident,” “resident family,” “nonmedical staff,” “medical staff,” “team,” “environment,” and “organizational management,” respectively. Owing to limited labels, “resident family” and “medical staff” were omitted from the model development process. The interannotator agreement values were higher than 0.6 for each label. A total of 10, 278, and 1855 reports contained no, 1, and multiple labels, respectively. The models trained using the report data outperformed those trained using sentences, with macro F1-scores of 0.744, 0.675, and 0.735 for Tohoku-BERT, UTH-BERT, and ELECTRA, respectively. The report-trained models also demonstrated better exact match accuracy, with 0.411, 0.389, and 0.399 for Tohoku-BERT, UTH-BERT, and ELECTRA, respectively. Notably, the accuracy was consistent even when the analysis was confined to reports containing multiple labels. Conclusions The multilabel classifier developed in our study demonstrated potential for identifying various factors associated with medication-related incidents using incident reports from residential care facilities. Thus, this classifier can facilitate prompt analysis of incident factors, thereby contributing to risk management and the development of preventive strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsFrench-language works237,207