MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A novel inducible animal model for studying chronic plasmalogen deficiency associated with Alzheimer’s disease

2024· article· en· W4400900129 on OpenAlexaff
Tara Smith, Kaeli J. Knudsen, Shawn Ritchie

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsPhenomenome Discoveries (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmalogenAlzheimer's diseaseNeuroscienceAnimal modelDiseaseMedicineBiologyPathologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plasmalogens are vinyl-ether glycerophospholipids critical for the structure and function of neuronal membranes. Deficient plasmalogen levels are associated with neurodegenerative diseases, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD), which has led to the hypothesis that plasmalogen deficiency might drive disease onset and progression. However, the lack of a suitable animal model with late-onset plasmalogen deficiency has prevented testing of this hypothesis. The goal of this project was therefore to develop and characterize a mouse model capable of undergoing a plasmalogen deficiency only in adulthood, mirroring the chronic decline thought to occur in AD. We report here the creation of a novel animal model containing a tamoxifen-inducible knockout of the Gnpat gene encoding the first step in the plasmalogen biosynthetic pathway. Tamoxifen treatment in adult animals resulted in a significant reduction of plasmalogens in both the circulation and tissues as early as four weeks. By four months, changes in behavior and nerve function were observed, with strong correlations between residual brain plasmalogen levels, hyperactivity, and latency. The model will be useful for further elucidating the role of plasmalogens in AD and evaluating plasmalogen therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.265
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain ResearchSame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207