MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400902501 · doi:10.1002/aah.10221

Comment on a perspective: Molecular detections of new agents in finfish—Interpreting biological significance for fish health management

2024· letter· en· W4400902501 on OpenAlexaff
Gideon Mordecai, Emiliano Di Cicco, Christoph Deeg, Andrew W. Bateman, Amy K. Teffer, Kristina M. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aquatic Animal Health · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicZoonotic diseases and public health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of TorontoFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFish <Actinopterygii>BiologyPerspective (graphical)Environmental ethicsFisheryComputational biologyZoologyEvolutionary biologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Impact statement The rapid development of genomic technologies has begun a new paradigm in the study and management of emerging infectious diseases. To inform the conservation of fish, here we examine different perspectives on how to determine thresholds for management action in the context of molecular tools and fisheries policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0990.066
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aquatic Animal HealthSame topicZoonotic diseases and public healthFrench-language works237,207