MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400905112 · doi:10.1109/tiv.2024.3432075

Intelligent EV Charging Control and Management: From Microscale Battery Cell to Macroscale Grid Synergy

2024· article· en· W4400905112 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroscale chemistryBattery (electricity)Control (management)GridGrid cellComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligencePower (physics)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid increase in electric vehicle (EV) use highlights the need for advanced charging infrastructure and strategies. This survey offers an in-depth exploration of EV charging, emphasizing its control and optimization dimensions. The analysis covers a broad spectrum, from the intricacies of individual battery cell management to the challenges of grid integration. The paper reviews various control methods and optimization techniques, addressing key factors like charging efficiency, battery life, safety measures, temperature control, and cell balancing. It also discusses the role of charging stations and energy storage systems in improving charging efficiency, grid stability, and handling peak demands. By examining the interaction between the grid and EV charging, the study explores grid limitations, power quality, and demand-side management. This comprehensive survey improves our understanding of EV charging control and optimization, paving the way for future research in this field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it