Enhanced Emergency Communication Services for Post–Disaster Rescue: Multi-IRS Assisted Air-Ground Integrated Data Collection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cellular networks are difficult to meet emergency rescue due to the destruction of base stations and infrastructure caused by natural disasters. Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) and other mobile communication devices encounter significant challenges when operating in disaster areas due to limited coverage and resources. To tackle this problem, this paper integrates Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) into the emergency communication network and constructs an air-ground integration network architecture with UAV-UGV collaboration. Specifically, multi-UGV collaborate to collect disaster information, and multi-aerial intelligent reflecting surfaces with high maneuverability can effectively assist UGVs in transmitting the collected data to the remote control center. However, there is also a serious challenge to optimize the collaboration strategy between UGVs and UAVs. To address the concern, the collaboration between UAVs and UGVs is modeled as bipartite graph, where UAVs and UGVs belong to different sets of nodes, respectively. The problem is transformed into a matching game based on the bipartite graph. A stable Bidirectional Matching Game (BMG) algorithm is proposed, where matching players maximize the utility by adjusting the selection strategy. Extensive experimental results show that the proposed BMG algorithm outperforms other benchmark algorithms in terms of utility for both UAVs and UGVs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".