SpotLess: Concurrent Rotational Consensus Made Practical Through Rapid View Synchronization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The emergence of blockchain technology has renewed the interest in consensus-based data management systems that are resilient to failures. To maximize the throughput of these systems, we have recently seen several prototype consensus solutions that optimize for throughput at the expense of overall implementation complexity, high costs, and reliability. Due to this, it remains unclear how these prototypes will perform in real-world environments. In this paper, we present SpotLess, a novel concurrent rotational consensus protocol made practical. Central to SpotLess is the combination of (1) a chained rotational consensus design for replicating requests with a reduced message cost and low-cost failure recovery that eliminates the traditional complex, error-prone view-change protocol; (2) the novel Rapid View Synchronization protocol that enables SpotLess to work in more general network assumptions, without a need for a Global Synchronization Time to synchronize view, and recover valid earlier views with the aid of non-faulty replicas without the need to rely on the primary; (3) a high-performance concurrent consensus architecture in which independent instances of the chained consensus operate concurrently to process requests with high throughput, thereby avoiding the bottlenecks seen in other rotational protocols. Due to the concurrent consensus architecture, SpotLess greatly outperforms traditional primary-backup consensus protocols such as Pbft (by up to 430%), Narwhal-HS (by up to 137%), and HotStuff (by up to 3803%). Due to its reduced message cost, SpotLess is even able to outperform RCC, a state-of-the-art high-throughput concurrent consensus protocol, by up to 23%. Furthermore, SpotLess is able to maintain a stable and low latency and consistently high throughput even during failures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it