Graph Contrastive Learning for Truth Inference
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crowdsourcing has become a popular paradigm for collecting large-scale labeled datasets by leveraging numerous annotators. However, these annotators often provide noisy labels due to varying expertise. Truth inference aims to infer accurate consensus labels from noisy crowdsourced annotations. Existing approaches rely heavily on hand-engineered assumptions or ground truth data, limiting their applicability. To address this, we propose GOVERN, a graph contrastive learning framework for truth inference without such external supervision. GOVERN employs a novel graph data augmentation strategy to generate views capturing worker coordination patterns. A contrastive objective then encourages invariant representations across views, enabling the discovery of features related to the hidden consensus. Further, a label correction method based on k-nearest neighbors refines noisy pseudo-labels to supervise model training. Comprehensive experiments on 9 real-world datasets demonstrate that GOVERN outperforms state-of-the-art truth inference techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it