MUSE adaptive-optics spectroscopy confirms dual active galactic nuclei and strongly lensed systems at sub-arcsec separation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The novel Gaia multi peak (GMP) technique has proven to be able to successfully select dual and lensed active galactic nuclei (AGN) candidates at sub-arcsecond separations. Both populations are important because dual AGN represent one of the central, still largely untested, predictions of ΛCDM cosmology, and compact lensed AGN allow us to probe the central regions of the lensing galaxies. In this work, we present high-spatial-resolution spectroscopy of 12 GMP-selected systems. We used the adaptive-optics assisted integral-field spectrograph MUSE at the VLT to resolve each system and investigate the nature of each component. All targets show the presence of two components confirming the GMP selection. We classify 4 targets as dual AGN, 3 as lensed quasar candidates, and 5 as a chance alignment of a star and an AGN. With separations ranging from 0.30″ to 0.86″, these dual and lensed systems are among the most compact systems discovered to date at z > 0.5. This is the largest sample of distant dual AGN with sub-arcsecond separations ever presented in a single paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".