Adaptive space search-based molecular evolution optimization algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: In the drug development process, a significant portion of the budget and research time are dedicated to the lead compound optimization procedure to identify potential drugs. This procedure focuses on enhancing the pharmacological and bioactive properties of compounds by optimizing their local substructures. However, due to the vast and discrete chemical structure space and the unpredictable element combinations within this space, the optimization process is inherently complex. Various structure enumeration-based combinatorial optimization methods have shown certain advantages. However, they still have limitations. Those methods fail to consider the differences between molecules and struggle to explore the unknown outer search space. RESULTS: In this study, we propose an adaptive space search-based molecular evolution optimization algorithm (ASSMOEA). It consists of three key modules: construction of molecule-specific search space, molecular evolutionary optimization, and adaptive expansion of molecule-specific search space. Specifically, we design a fragment similarity tree in a molecule-specific search space and apply a dynamic mutation strategy in this space to guide molecular optimization. Then, we utilize an encoder-encoder structure to adaptively expand the space. Those three modules are circled iteratively to optimize molecules. Our experiments demonstrate that ASSMOEA outperforms existing methods in terms of molecular optimization. It not only enhances the efficiency of the molecular optimization process but also exhibits a robust ability to search for correct solutions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code is freely available on the web at https://github.com/bbbbb-b/MEOAFST.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".