MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400924432 · doi:10.1002/cjce.25421

Leaching phosphorous from the lime mud of kraft pulp mills: Towards sustainability

2024· article· en· W4400924432 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Maryam Sadegh Mousavi, Nikolai DeMartini

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhosphorus and nutrient management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of TorontoFPInnovations
KeywordsKraft processLimeLeaching (pedology)Kraft paperPulp and paper industrySustainabilityEnvironmental scienceWaste managementPulp (tooth)MetallurgyEngineeringMaterials scienceSoil scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The optimum conditions needed to separate phosphorus from the lime mud generated in kraft pulp mills were identified using different leaching solutions including carbonate, bicarbonate, and green liquor under variety of conditions. Carbonate ions seemed to be the active ion in the phosphorus leaching process. Bicarbonate solution seems to be the most effective leaching agent by removing 84% of phosphorus under the optimum operating conditions of 95°C, 2.92 m, and solution‐to‐ mud mass ratio of 3.6. The shrinking core model was used to determine the leaching mechanism and it showed that the leaching process is controlled by a mix of chemical reaction and diffusion through the particle. Two empirical models were developed to predict the leaching efficiency as a function of carbonate concentration and temperature. Counter‐current leaching was shown to be beneficial in increasing the leaching efficiency with the carbonate solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicPhosphorus and nutrient managementFrench-language works237,207