MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400932948 · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00259

Tractography from T1-weighted MRI: Empirically exploring the clinical viability of streamline propagation without diffusion MRI

2024· article· en· W4400932948 on OpenAlexaff
Leon Y. Cai, Ho Hin Lee, Graham W. Johnson, Nancy R. Newlin, Karthik Ramadass, Michael E. Kim, Derek B. Archer, Timothy J. Hohman, Angela L. Jefferson, J. Patrick Begnoche, Brian D. Boyd, Warren D. Taylor, Victoria L. Morgan, Dario J. Englot, Vishwesh Nath, Silky Chotai, Laura A. Barquero, Micah D’Archangel, Laurie E. Cutting, Benoît M. Dawant, François Rheault, Daniel Moyer, Kurt G. Schilling, John C. Gore, Bennett A. Landman

Bibliographic record

VenueImaging Neuroscience · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringAlzheimer's AssociationNational Institute on AgingNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesVanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's CenterVanderbilt University Medical CenterVanderbilt UniversityNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTractographyDiffusion MRIComputer sciencePopulationNeuroimagingLimitingWhite matterArtificial intelligenceMagnetic resonance imagingMedicinePsychologyNeuroscienceRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

estimation of white matter (WM) pathways in the brain. One key limitation to this technique is that modern tractography implementations require high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI). However, HARDI can be difficult to collect clinically, limiting the reach of tractography analyses to research cohorts and thus limiting many WM investigations to certain populations and pathologies. As such, a clinically viable tractography solution applicable to wider patient populations scanned as a part of routine care would be of key significance in broadening WM analyses to underfunded or rarer diseases and to the clinical setting. Such a solution would require the ability to perform arbitrary tractography analyses, use only clinical imaging for input, and be open source and widely accessible and implementable. Thus, here we evaluate our recently developed, containerized, and open-source, T1-weighted (T1w) MRI-based deep learning model for streamline propagation. We empirically assess its performance against traditional dMRI-based and established atlas-based approaches in a healthy young population, an aging one, and in those with epilepsy, depression, and brain cancer. In the healthy young population, we find slightly increased error compared to traditional tractography with the deep learning model that falls within the bounds attributable to dMRI variability and is considerably less than the atlas-based approach. Further, seeking to replicate previously published dMRI tractography effects in the remaining cohorts as an initial assessment of clinical viability, we find this model successfully does so in some key cases-particularly in applications that rely on long-range streamlines including those not captured by the atlas-based approach-but importantly not all. These results suggest a deep learning-based approach to tractography with T1w MRI demonstrates promise within the limitations of our definition of clinical viability and especially over atlas-based approaches but requires refinement and more robust consideration of out-of-distribution effects prior to widespread clinical use. We also find these results raise additional questions regarding the differences in image content between dMRI and T1w MRI and their relationship to tractography. Further investigation of these questions will improve the field's understanding of which features of the brain influence measured tractography effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImaging NeuroscienceSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207