MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analysis of Novel Single-Stage Isolated Cuk-derived Converter for 800-V Electric Vehicle Onboard Charger

2024· article· en· W4400934391 on OpenAlexaff
Sukanya Dutta, Jennifer Bauman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsĆuk converterSingle stageElectric vehicleStage (stratigraphy)Electrical engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringCapacitorVoltageAerospace engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, some research and development efforts have focused on 800-V passenger electric vehicles due to their ability to accept high fast-charge power levels. These vehicles still require an on-board charger (OBC), since convenient and lowcost overnight charging from residential power supplies will be important for powering regular commutes. There are some new challenges involved with designing efficient and compact 800-V OBCs, as they must have a high voltage gain from the 120-V or 240-V AC input, they must have high efficiency across a wide range of output voltages, as the battery charges from low to high state-of-charge, and they will require some higher voltage devices which increases cost. Though some 800-V OBC designs have been presented in the literature, many have a high component count. This paper presents a novel single-stage isolated Cuk-based 800V OBC with a low number of components, simple structure, and straightforward control. The operational principle is discussed and detailed simulation results are provided. The simulation results validate the converter operation, and show a low THD (1.71%), near unity power factor, and peak efficiency of 97.5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207