MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400942683 · doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.07.017

Review – Renal transplantation for congenital urological diseases

2024· review· en· W4400942683 on OpenAlexaff
Jin K. Kim, Joana Dos Santos, Mandy Rickard, Armando J. Lorenzo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Urology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransplantationKidney transplantationIntensive care medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract (CAKUT) are structural disorders originating prenatally and present at birth. Affecting 4.2 to 1000 per 10,000 births globally, CAKUT includes conditions like posterior urethral valves, cloacal anomalies, and reflux nephropathy. These anomalies can lead to chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in children, necessitating renal replacement therapy or transplantation. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to provide an updated perspective on pediatric kidney transplantation for children with CAKUT, emphasizing pre-transplant evaluation and management to optimize long-term outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive urologic evaluation is essential for children with ESKD being considered for kidney transplantation. Key pre-transplant investigations include kidney/bladder ultrasound (US), voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), uroflowmetry, and urodynamics (UDS)/video-urodynamics (VUDS). Non-operative interventions such as pharmacotherapy and clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) are also considered. Surgical interventions, like augmentation cystoplasty or continent catheterizable channels, are evaluated based on individual patient needs. RESULTS: Kidney/bladder US and VCUG provide essential anatomical information. UDS offers comprehensive functional data, identifying hostile bladders needing pre-transplant optimization. Non-surgical measures like anticholinergics and CIC improve bladder function, while surgical options enhance compliance and capacity. Concurrent interventions during transplantation are feasible but require careful consideration of risks and benefits. DISCUSSION: Children with CAKUT undergoing kidney transplantation exhibit comparable or better graft survival rates than those without CAKUT. However, those with lower urinary tract obstructions (LUTO) may have poorer long-term outcomes. UDS is crucial for evaluating bladder function pre-transplant, guiding the need for interventions. Long-term monitoring for urinary tract infections (UTIs) and bladder dysfunction is essential. CONCLUSION: Optimal outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation for CAKUT patients require thorough pre-transplant evaluation and management, particularly for those with LUTO. Multidisciplinary approaches ensure careful monitoring and timely interventions, improving graft survival and quality of life for these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric UrologySame topicPediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesFrench-language works237,207