MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400944934 · doi:10.1007/s13366-024-00758-7

An axiom system for absolute plane geometry in terms of collinearity and congruence

2024· article· en· W4400944934 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBeiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie / Contributions to Algebra and Geometry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Anthropology Society
FundersUniversität Stuttgart
KeywordsCongruence (geometry)MathematicsCollinearityHyperbolic geometryAxiomGeometryPlane (geometry)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisAlgebraic geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present an axiom system in terms of collinearity and congruence for plane geometry independent of assumptions about parallels. The line reflections and motions of corresponding geometries are studied, and it is shown that the axiom system characterizes the non-elliptic metric planes in the sense of Bachmann with midpoints. If the hyperbolic axiom is added, we show that the familiar algebraic models of hyperbolic planes result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it