MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bidirectional Multilevel Universal Charger with Decentralized Control Structure for Powering Light Electric Mobility Applications

2024· article· en· W4400946092 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Babaie, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl (management)Electric lightComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electric Bicycles (E-bikes) are an emerging class of light electric mobility vehicles that enhance the urban transportation system in a highly efficient and green manner. Because of the compact dimension, an E-bike carries a small battery, which needs daily multiple charges. Thus, the growing number of E-bikes requires many private and public charging stations, which could be a direct source of distortion for the grid power quality and resiliency. The massive number of E-bikes however can be considered as an effective capacity to provide ancillary services for the grid. Accordingly, this paper introduces a Bidirectional Fast Charger (BFC) for E-bikes based on a new compact multilevel converter topology and an advanced hybrid controller. The proposed BFC supplies E-bikes with different voltage levels in charging mode and supports the grid with ancillary services using the stored energy of the battery during inverting mode. The presented implementation results collected in different test scenarios validate the feasibility of the proposed bidirectional multilevel fast charger for future industrialization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207