Anisotropic Contributions in the Chromatographic Elution Behavior of Fullerenes and Fullertubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The retention behavior of fullerenes and fullertubes on a PYE column in reversed-phase chromatography was investigated to clarify the influence of their shapes on the separation process. The impact of anisotropy was further elucidated using a pair potential interaction model, together with experimental data and ab initio calculations, to evaluate its contribution to various parameters characterizing the interaction models. The findings indicate that the shape of fullerenes plays a more significant role than anticipated in the retention mechanisms, highlighting the necessity of considering the shape of fullerenes and fullertubes to accurately predict their retention times. Furthermore, a phenomenological pair potential was devised to demonstrate the feasibility of precisely predicting the retention times of fullerenes and fullertubes through first-principles calculations, regardless of their shape. The existence of such a model paves the way for the development of a method to identify isomers of fullerenes from minute amounts of sample.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".