MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400954100 · doi:10.3233/shti240323

Trauma-Informed Technology Design in Digital Sexual Health Interventions

2024· article· en· W4400954100 on OpenAlexafffund
Janell C. Josephs, Vicky Bungay, Adrian Guţă, Mark Gilbert, Abdul‐Fatawu Abdulai

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in health technology and informatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of WindsorUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConfidentialityPsychological interventionDigital healthInternet privacyReproductive healthComputer securityHealth information technologyPsychologyMedicineComputer scienceNursingHealth carePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital health provides a great opportunity to increase access to sexual health information and/or services. However, it can inadvertently cause emotional trauma to end users depending on how it is designed or deployed. In this study, we explored recommendations for designing trauma-informed digital health technologies and identified three preliminary themes. These include considerations for privacy and confidentiality, intuitive and representative designs and inclusive language.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in health technology and informaticsSame topicSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207