The first hadrosauroid eggshell from the Aix-en-Provence Basin (late Maastrichtian) of France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nearly all dinosaur egg or oospecies occurrences from the Upper Cretaceous of France have been attributed to titanosaur dinosaurs. Here, we describe the first occurrence of probable hadrosauroid eggshells from France, which we assign to a new oospecies, Paraspheroolithus porcarboris oosp. nov. (oofamily: Spheroolithidae), from the upper ‘Argiles et Grès à Reptiles’ Formation (upper Maastrichtian) of Aix-en-Provence. Paraspheroolithus porcarboris differs from all other spheroolithid oospecies in the following combination of characteristics: prolatospherulitic morphotype, prolatocanaliculate pore system, prominent anastomosing ornamentation, medium eggshell thickness, less defined horizontal accretion lines and high pore density. The spheroolithid affinity places the new ootaxon outside oofamilies ascribed to titanosaurs (i.e. Megaloolithidae and Fusioolithidae), and thus its discovery expands the parataxonomic diversity of this region and formation. We suggest the taxonomic affinity of Spheroolithidae is somewhat broader than Hadrosauroidea, potentially encompassing all Ornithopoda. However, a hadrosauroid affinity remains the most plausible for Paraspheroolithus porcarboris based on the absence of other ornithopod remains from late Maastrichtian deposits of the Ibero-Armorican Island.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".