MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400957483 · doi:10.1002/smtd.202400812

Hybrid Zwitterionic Hydrogels with Encoded Differential Swelling and Programmed Deformation for Small‐Scale Robotics

2024· article· en· W4400957483 on OpenAlexafffund
Negin Bouzari, Rasool Nasseri, Junting Huang, Sayan Ganguly, Xiaowu Tang, Tizazu H. Mekonnen, Amirreza Aghakhani, Hamed Shahsavan

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall Methods · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Materials and Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSelf-healing hydrogelsSoft roboticsMorphingSwellingMaterials scienceRobotSoft materialsComputer scienceNanotechnologyAcrylateBiomedical engineeringArtificial intelligenceComposite materialEngineeringPolymer chemistryPolymerCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stimuli-responsive shape-morphing hydrogels with self-healing and tunable physiochemical properties are excellent candidates for functional building blocks of untethered small-scale soft robots. With mechanical properties similar to soft organs and tissues, such robots enable minimally invasive medical procedures, such as cargo/cell transportation. In this work, responsive hydrogels based on zwitterionic/acrylate chemistry with self-healing and stimuli-responsiveness are synthesized. Such hydrogels are then judiciously cut and pasted to form hybrid constructs with predetermined swelling and elastic anisotropy. This method is used to program hydrogel constructs with predetermined 2D-to-3D deformation upon exposure to different environmental ionic strengths. Untethered soft robotic functionalities are demonstrated, such as actuation, magnetic locomotion, and targeted transport of soft and light cargo in flooded media. The proposed hydrogel expands the repertoire of functional materials for fabricating small-scale soft robots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmall MethodsSame topicAdvanced Materials and MechanicsFrench-language works237,207