MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Challenges in managing neonatal ileal atresia in limited-resource settings: a case report

2024· article· en· W4400961762 on OpenAlexaff
Frank Martin Sudai, Macrice Yakayashi, Lusajo Mwagobele, Peter Kafubhi, Habakuki Ntabudyo, Kasili Joseph Magembe, Lazaro Yohana Madeha, Stanley Zakaria Binagi, Joseph Nangawe, Jesca Paul Lebba

Bibliographic record

VenuePan African Medical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
Canadian institutionsGovernment of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResource (disambiguation)Intensive care medicineMedicineBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neonatal ileal atresia is a form of intestinal obstruction characterized by narrowing, complete closure, or absence of a segment of the ileum. This case involves a 5-day-old female neonate presented with abdominal distension and bilious vomiting. The neonate, delivered via spontaneous vertex birth weighing 2.9 kg, showed no fever and maintained stable vital signs during examination. Physical assessment revealed abdominal distension, hyper-tympanic areas, dullness in the lower quadrants, reduced bowel sounds, and a patent anus with an empty rectum. Imaging studies confirmed intestinal obstruction from dilated small bowels, leading to explorative laparotomy identifying ileal atresia, necessitating cecostomy placement. Despite surgical intervention, the neonate experienced nutritional complications and unfortunately passed away three days postoperatively. This case underscores the complexities of early diagnosis and management in neonates with intrauterine conditions, particularly in resource-limited settings with limited access to total parenteral nutrition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePan African Medical JournalSame topicIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction DisordersFrench-language works237,207