Defining a core breath profile for healthy, non-human primates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-human primates remain the most useful and reliable pre-clinical model for many human diseases. Primate breath profiles have previously distinguished healthy animals from diseased, including non-human primates. Breath collection is relatively non-invasive, so this motivated us to define a healthy baseline breath profile that could be used in studies evaluating disease, therapies, and vaccines in non-human primates. A pilot study, which enrolled 30 healthy macaques, was conducted. Macaque breath molecules were sampled into a Tedlar bag, concentrated onto a thermal desorption tube, then desorbed and analyzed by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time of flight mass spectrometry. These breath samples contained 2,017 features, of which 113 molecules were present in all breath samples. The core breathprint was dominated by aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic compounds, and carbonyl compounds. The data were internally validated with additional breath samples from a subset of 19 of these non-human primates. A critical core consisting of 23 highly abundant and invariant molecules was identified as a pragmatic breathprint set, useful for future validation studies in healthy primates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".