MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400970020 · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ad678c

Investigation of operational settings, environmental conditions, and faults on the gas turbine performance

2024· article· en· W4400970020 on OpenAlexaff
Shazaib Ahsan, ‪Tamiru Alemu Lemma, Muhammad Baqir Hashmi, Xihui Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement Science and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGas turbinesEnvironmental scienceReliability engineeringComputer scienceProcess engineeringPetroleum engineeringMechanical engineeringGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gas turbine engines are complex mechanical marvels widely employed in diverse applications such as marine vessels, aircraft, power generation, and pumping facilities. However, their intricate nature renders them susceptible to numerous operational faults, significantly compromising their performance and leading to excessive emissions, consequently incurring stringent penalties from environmental regulatory bodies. Moreover, the deterioration of gas turbine performance is exacerbated by variations in working conditions based on operational settings and environmental conditions. Past studies have focused on certain working conditions that limit effectiveness in real-world applications where operational settings and environmental conditions vary during operations. The influence of these working conditions on the performance of gas turbines also needs to be assessed, as they can lead to different fault patterns resulting in unplanned maintenance, unnecessary maintenance costs, unsafe conditions and stringent penalties. This study uses the gas turbine simulation program to simulate a high-bypass turbofan engine inspired by Pratt & Whitney PW-4056, analysing the combined effects of operational settings and environmental conditions on engine performance while also incorporating simulations of common gas turbine faults like fouling and erosion in various locations and severities along the gas path. The model’s accuracy is confirmed by low mean absolute percentage errors of 0.004% of thrust at the cycle reference point and 0.15% and 0.28% at 2 km and 7 km altitudes, respectively, demonstrating the model’s robustness across varying operational scenarios. In conclusion, this research highlights the significant effects of operational settings and environmental factors on gas turbine performance, particularly impacting specific fuel consumption and thrust. The study reveals that operational settings and environmental factors significantly impact fuel consumption and thrust. Specifically, compressor fouling and low-pressure turbine erosion increase nitrogen oxide (NO x ) emissions by 4.5% and 11.1%, while fouling of nozzle guide vanes and high-pressure turbine erosion raise unburned hydrocarbon by 10.0% and 20.2%, and carbon monoxide (CO) by 3.2% and 5.2%, respectively, compared to a healthy engine. These insights highlight the importance of component-specific degradation in influencing gas turbine performance and emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeasurement Science and TechnologySame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207