MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400973175 · doi:10.3390/photonics11080694

Smartphone-Readable Optical-Fiber Quasi-Distributed Phosphorescent Temperature Sensor

2024· article· en· W4400973175 on OpenAlexaff
Tinko Eftimov, Irena Kostova, Samia Fouzar, Daniel BRABANT, Kristian Nikolov, Veselin Vladev

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotonics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphorescenceMaterials scienceOptical fiberTemperature measurementFiber optic sensorOptoelectronicsOpticsResponse timeDistributed acoustic sensingTemperature controlFabricationMeasure (data warehouse)PhysicsComputer scienceFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present the principle of operation, fabrication and performance of a phosphorescent optical-fiber quasi-distributed sensor with contactless smartphone interrogation. An array of short strong corrugated long-period gratings (C-LPG) is used as a platform to spatially locate and to excite the phosphors whose time responses are temperature-dependent. The C-LPG array was fabricated using a pulsed CO2 laser. The quasi-distributed sensing array is excited by a UV LED and the normalized differential rise/decay time response measured by a smartphone is used as a measure of the temperature. The sensing spots have a volume smaller than 0.5 μL, can be separated by several millimeters to several meters and the interrogation can be simultaneous or in a sequence. The response and the sensitivity to temperature have been measured. The sensing array has been shown to measure abrupt and gradual temperature changes in space as well as time-dependent processes in the 0 °C to 100 °C range and with a measurement time of 1 s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotonicsSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207