Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections (NAC-STBBI) Statement: Recommendations on Screening for Syphilis in Non-Pregnant Adults and Adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Sustained and significant increases in Canadian rates of infectious syphilis prompted the National Advisory Committee on Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections (NAC-STBBI) to update the existing screening recommendation for non-pregnant adults and adolescents. Methods: These guidelines were developed following the 2014 World Health Organization Handbook. The research question was: "What is the clinical utility of syphilis screening using risk-based versus population-wide approaches for adolescents and adults?" The evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: The environmental scan included 11 guidelines on syphilis screening published between 2014 and January 2023. Two systematic reviews were identified and included. In the updated literature search from November 6, 2019, to January 17, 2023, there were no published systematic reviews on the effectiveness of risk-based screening or the comparison of risk-based and interval screening; however, one recent randomized control trial in Canada was published. Evidence for outcomes, patient values and preferences, resources, acceptability, equity, cost and cost effectiveness and feasibility were reviewed. Conclusion: This statement provides two screening recommendations for adults and adolescents. Recommendation 1: NAC-STBBI recommends syphilis screening in all sexually active persons with a new or multiple partners and/or upon request of the individual. They also recommend screening every three to six months in individuals with multiple partners. Recommendation 2: NAC-STBBI recommends that targeted "opt-out" screening programs should be considered as frequently as every three months when serving population groups and/or communities experiencing a high prevalence of syphilis (and other STBBI). Both are strong recommendations with moderate certainty of evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.166 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".