L’utilisation de symboles dans les mouvements sociaux autochtones de Montréal : une « traduction interculturelle » ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les Peuples autochtones emploient une variété de symboles dans leurs luttes politiques et sociales dans la ville de Montréal. Ces symboles relèvent d’une certaine hybridité entre les impositions culturelles de la société dominante de descendance euro-canadienne et les traditions des nombreuses cultures autochtones du Canada. Les mêmes objets, vêtements et mises en scène sont employés par des activistes autochtones de Nations diverses révélant des référentiels identitaires communs souvent empreints d’une certaine homogénéisation. Pour autant, les Autochtones réinvestissent consciemment ces symboles participant à faire évoluer cette iconographie protestataire de façon constante. Cet article propose d’analyser l’utilisation de ces symboles dans l’activisme autochtone contemporain comme une forme de communication interculturelle, à la fois entre les Autochtones issus de Nations distinctes, mais également entre les Autochtones et le reste de la société. De plus, il illustre le potentiel de ces symboles dans l’évolution des représentations existantes envers les Autochtones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".