Entre l’arbre et l’écorce : discours des francophones en situation minoritaires lors des négociations constitutionnelles entourant l’Accord du lac Meech
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude vise à mieux comprendre les représentations sociales des francophones vivant dans les provinces et territoires à majorité anglophones à l’égard de leur rapport au Québec lors des négociations de l’Accord du lac Meech. Elle s’appuie sur une analyse thématique du discours recueilli dans des journaux de langue française, desquels émergent deux axes. D’une part, les francophones en situation minoritaire se sentent trahis et abandonnés par le Québec, suggérant une possible éclipse de la mémoire de la Révolution tranquille et de l’effritement du Canada français. D’autre part, l’entente constitutionnelle proposée suscite une profonde prise de conscience et d’importants questionnements au sujet de leur place au sein de la fédération canadienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".