MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400975293 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3433558

Hybrid NOMA-OMA Transmission Scheduling for Production Efficiency Maximization in Industrial Edge Computing Networks

2024· article· en· W4400975293 on OpenAlexaff
Yunzhi Zhao, Yanhua Pei, Yong Liu, Fen Hou, Weihua Zhuang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersChina University of Mining and TechnologyNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceNomaScheduling (production processes)MaximizationComputer networkDistributed computingMathematical optimizationTelecommunications link

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a mobile edge computing (MEC) assisted Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) network, where multiple assembly processing lines in a smart factory are equipped with sensing devices. They sense raw products, generate and offload computing tasks, and finally process the raw products based on the computing results. In this scenario, different positions of the processing machines lead to different priorities and diverse Quality-of-Service (QoS) requirements of tasks. Therefore, how to schedule tasks and allocate the network resources becomes a critical and challenging issue. In this study, we introduce a novel batch-based hybrid nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA)/orthogonal multiple access (OMA) transmission scheme. The selection between NOMA and OMA schemes is optimized based on the QoS requirements of tasks. Then, we formulate a production efficiency maximization problem with the objective of maximizing the speed of the assembly lines subject to the deadline constraints of offloading and computing procedures. To this end, a two-layer decomposition method is used to decompose the formulated problem into two subproblems. Furthermore, we utilize a bisection searching method to approximate the optimal solution, and propose an efficient method to determine the feasibility of the top-layer subproblem. Simulation results demonstrate the significant performance improvement of our proposed method. In specific, the production efficiency is enhanced by 525% in comparison with pure NOMA scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207