Remote Monitoring and Control of Agricultural Systems Using IoT and Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cutting-edge technology is essential to improve resource use, output, and farming methods to meet climate change and other needs. This research uses IoT and machine learning to remotely track and operate agricultural infrastructure.The Internet of Things (IoT) lets several sensors strategically placed around the farm collect data simultaneously. These sensors assess temperature, humidity, and soil wetness, which determine crop health. The data is wirelessly delivered from a central location to a designated area for processing and analysis.Machine learning is used to interpret data. These algorithms can improve irrigation schedules, predict food yields, diagnose diseases, and offer insect control alternatives. Machine learning (ML) models improve by learning from data and adapting to environmental circumstances.The system allows remote farming monitoring using actuators and automated tools. An easy-to-use interface on desktops or mobile devices allows agricultural experts utilise machine learning models to regulate insecticides, modify irrigation water, and start harvesting remotely.The proposed technology improves farming productivity, durability, resource efficiency, and cost. It encourages farmers to make sensible decisions and manage their resources to better address environmental issues.To conclude, Machine Learning and the Internet of Things could considerably improve farming system remote monitoring and control. The development of new technologies in this field is crucial to its long-term success and ability to provide for future generations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".