MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Suboptimal Bayesian Filters for Markov Jump Linear Systems with Unknown Noise Covariance

2024· article· en· W4400977333 on OpenAlex
Shuang Gao, Xiaoli Luan, Biao Huang, Shunyi Zhao, Haiying Wan, Fei Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCovarianceBayesian probabilityComputer scienceNoise (video)Markov processMarkov chainJumpAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMachine learningPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quality of measurements plays a crucial role in industrial processes. This paper proposes a novel suboptimal filter for Markov jump linear systems (MJLSs) that deals with the challenge of unknown measurement covariance. To limit the number of feasible mode sequences, variational Bayesian (VB) inference is employed to approximate the posterior Gaussian mixture distribution. This is achieved by representing it as a product of Gaussian and categorical distribution, aiming to minimize the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. The resultant recursion turns out to be a new suboptimal Bayesian estimator, adept at simultaneously estimating system states, modal state, and measurement noise covariance, all within a unified probabilistic framework. The target tracking example is presented to illustrate that the proposed method is a competitive alternative to existing suboptimal estimation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it