MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400982707 · doi:10.1002/rnc.7549

Dynamic‐surface‐based adaptive predefined‐time control for nonlinear non‐affine switched systems with sensor fault

2024· article· en· W4400982707 on OpenAlexaff
Ke Xu, Huanqing Wang, Peter Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemSingularityComputer scienceAffine transformationSettling timeController (irrigation)Adaptive controlFault (geology)Lyapunov functionMathematicsControl engineeringControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceStep response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The adaptive neural tracking fault‐tolerant control problem is considered for nonlinear non‐affine switched systems with sensor faults via dynamic surface control (DSC) technique under arbitrary switchings within predefined‐time interval. During the controller design process, the non‐affine formation strictly processed so that the implicit control signals can be transformed into explicit ones. The introduction of hyperbolic tangent function to design the control signal eliminates the singularity at the same time, but also avoids the tedious discussion of the segmentation function to solve the singularity. Considering Lyapunov stability theorem, an adaptive fault tolerant control approach is presented, which means that the settling‐time can be programmed by the user practical specification under arbitrary switching, the predefined time boundedness of all closed‐loop signals can be ensured, and the influence of sensor faults can be compensated. The effectiveness of the presented method is verified via simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear ControlSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207