MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400985584 · doi:10.23977/cpcs.2024.080108

Design of Virtual Reality Interactive Applications Based on Wireless Communication Technology

2024· article· en· W4400985584 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing Performance and Communication systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSimulation and Modeling Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirtual realityHuman–computer interactionComputer scienceWirelessMultimediaTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of computer hardware and network systems, virtual reality technology has penetrated into many industries, representing a new application trend from server virtualization to storage virtualization. Virtual reality technology is the core of new research. This article uses MATLAB as the underlying computing environment to study the design of virtual reality interactive applications based on wireless communication technology. This paper proposes an RLMCom model for high-speed communication between domains, which covers the old network protocol stack and domain forwarding, and uses shared memory directly between domains to send and receive data, thereby reducing network communication paths. At the same time, the RLMCom model also provides compatibility with traditional network programming interfaces, allowing users to use high-speed RLMCom communications without modifying existing applications. The experimental results of this work show that the RLMCom model can significantly improve the communication efficiency between departments. The communication throughput rate based on the RLMCom model has reached 258% of TCP communication, and the delay time is about 1/5 of that of ordinary TCP communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputing Performance and Communication systemsSame topicSimulation and Modeling ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207