MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400987401 · doi:10.23977/jeeem.2024.070213

The Impact of New Energy Integration on Traditional Relay Protection Systems and Countermeasures

2024· article· en· W4400987401 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electrotechnology Electrical Engineering and Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayElectric power systemComputer sciencePower-system protectionProtective relayFault (geology)Stability (learning theory)Reliability engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing penetration of new energy into the power system is accompanied by a series of challenges that traditional relay protection systems face: fast fault detection and decreased protection action time, and decreased system stability. By taking a series of countermeasures, the paper explored the influence of new energy connection on traditional relay protection systems in response to the occurrence of the above phenomenon. These countermeasures include protection logic and settings optimization, fast fault detection technology application, adaptive protection strategy application, and enhancing communication and data processing systems. After the countermeasures were applied, the response time was improved, that is, the speed of fault detection and protection action was improved. The stability of the systems was optimized through implementing protection strategies, enhancing the dynamic response capability, and applying data analysis and intelligent technology. As new energy has impacts on the traditional relay protection system, through applying a series of countermeasures, the fault detection and protection action speed was waned, and the stability of the system was increased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electrotechnology Electrical Engineering and ManagementSame topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207