MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400991709 · doi:10.69554/ilxb9447

Localism — call it the Y factor: The Gaeltacht Quarter and the East End have got talent, so Y not use it?

2011· article· en· W4400991709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Seán Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of urban regeneration and renewal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of British Isles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocalismQuarter (Canadian coin)Factor (programming language)Political scienceTelecommunicationsGeographyEngineeringComputer scienceLawPoliticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every moment in a life contains a multitude of small localised choices which themselves lead to a multitude of other possible choices. The Burning of Bombay Street in 1969 offered a split in the road: in one direction, there was hostility, hurt, harm; in another, something more constructive, positive and empowering. Bricks were lifted not to be thrown, but to be placed next to another and another. In this way, homes were built, a street emerged, a community was re-created, and the ambition of Belfast’s Irish-language community began to take root. Their ‘can do’ movement established the Gaeltacht Quarter, with its nursery, primary and secondary schools, social clubs, small and large businesses, book stores, shops, cafés and a radio station. The pulse of today’s changing Belfast is taken from here. But this is no look back: the mirror tells us what is behind, but what lies ahead is the goal of this paper: the continuing potential for connections between what people dared to achieve in the past and what they can achieve today.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.024
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of urban regeneration and renewalSame topicHistorical Studies of British IslesFrench-language works237,207