MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400992389 · doi:10.69554/whnv9306

More than fun and games: How New Brunswick Community College used prize giveaways to encourage alumni engagement

2017· article· en· W4400992389 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tom Meadus, Heather Allaby

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of education advancement & marketing. · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovations in Educational Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommunity collegeSociologyMathematics educationMedia studiesPsychologyPublic relationsAdvertisingPolitical scienceMedical educationBusinessMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Each year, alumni offices invest precious time and resources in incentives, contests and prizes aimed at engaging alumni. In an era of information saturation how can advancement professionals make the most of these investments? This was the challenge faced by the newly-formed Alumni Association of the New Brunswick Community College (NBCC). NBCC had a new alumni association, a non-committed alumni base, dated information and a need to get alumni to provide updated contact information. Learn how NBCC developed and launched a successful ‘spring cleaning campaign’ to encourage alumni to update their information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of education advancement & marketing.Same topicInnovations in Educational MethodsFrench-language works237,207