MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401005985 · doi:10.1515/9783839473412-015

8. Aminata Camara: Negotiating privilege, kinship and care in diasporic travel

2024· book-chapter· en· W4401005985 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuetranscript Verlag eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinshipPrivilege (computing)NegotiationSociologyPolitical scienceAnthropologySocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aminata Camara: Negotiating privilege, kinship and care in diasporic travelAminata Camara, now in her thirties, feels rooted and at home in Germany.Nevertheless, especially since she has had children of her own, it has been a wish of hers to engage in a continuous relationship with West Africa and to transmit her African origins (Guinean on her side and Ghanaian on her husband's) to the next generation.They finally made a family trip to Accra in 2016, when the kids were five and one.Following that initial family visit, Aminata's idea now is to go every few years in order to tune in to life there and become accustomed to Ghana -to properly get to know the surroundings, everyday life, and potentially to build a house.More particularly, she wants to get to know her kin and for her family become members of the community.David Duval (2004) and Lauren Wagner (2008) both point out that a central motivation of 'return' visits or family visits can be to increase or normalise relations with transnational family.In his study on the meanings of return visits of Caribbean migrants in Toronto, Duval (2004) found that for many primomigrants 'full return' was not the desired ideal; it was more important to be able to potentially combine the best of both worlds and, if possible, to engage in a transnational life.That is even more the case for descendants of migrants for whom full return is not an option, as they were born and socialised in another country than that of their parents.In this chapter, I contend that the experience of diasporic travel is not only a way to reimagine what home and belonging mean but that it is also a ground for experiencing and facing one's own shifting social, cultural and economic positions.In the previous chapter, I examined Lafia's roots travel, which was also a family visit.Here, the main point of the visit is to meet family with whom Aminata has regular contact, although they have not yet seen each other in the flesh.Although Aminata lives with her family in Frankfurt, they are part of the family in Ghana, too, as Albert's mother lives there and regularly receives news from Ghana.Much like in Maya's case, diasporic relations are part of the family's everyday environment.Aminata travelled with her family to Ghana a few years ago.This was not roots travel in the first sense for Aminata, as her father is from Guinea.Rather, Ghana is the country of parental origin of both of Albert's parents.It was thus a trip to meet her

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuetranscript Verlag eBooksSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207