MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401007142 · doi:10.1002/asjc.3471

Fixed‐time fault‐tolerant control for power system with multiple actuator constraints

2024· article· en· W4401007142 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Control · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorControl theory (sociology)Fault toleranceComputer scienceControl (management)Power (physics)Fault (geology)Control engineeringEngineeringDistributed computingPhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper copes with the fixed‐time fault‐tolerant control problem for a single‐machine infinite power system with static VAR compensators. In order to handle the controller design problem caused by the actuator failures and unknown dead zone input, a fuzzy fault‐tolerant control algorithm is derived by introducing the adaptive backstepping method. An adaptive fixed‐time control strategy is designed to guarantee that the output signal can track the desired trajectory within a fixed time, where the convergence time is independent of the initial condition. Compared with existing results, the proposed controller guarantees the controlled system maintains semiglobal fixed‐time stability and the tracking error converges to a small neighborhood around zero. Both actuator faults and dead zones have been considered, which can better meet the practical control requirements. A simulation example demonstrates the designed controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it