MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401008598 · doi:10.31223/x55d84

Tomotectonics of Cordilleran North America since Jurassic times: double-sided subduction, archipelago collisions, and Baja-BC translation

2024· preprint· en· W4401008598 on OpenAlexaff
Karin Sigloch, Mitchell G. Mihalynuk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySubductionArchipelagoLithosphereNorth American PlateBatholithVolcanic arcSeafloor spreadingTectonicsSeismologyPaleontologyPlate tectonicsGeophysicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tomotectonics hindcasts paleo-trenches, through the spatiotemporal superposition of subducted lithosphere (slabs imaged in the earth’s mantle) with plate reconstructions (constrained by seafloor isochrons). The two geophysical datasets are linked through the tomotectonic null hypothesis, that oceanic lithosphere sinks vertically down after entering in the mantle. This linkage permits simple and testable predictions about the location and lifespan of volcanic arcs, and specifically, about arc-continent collisions, switches in subduction polarity, and switches from consuming to transform plate boundaries. Tomotectonics uses land geological observations for validation. We explain the tomotectonic method, with a conceptual separation of its (geophysical) hypothesis-generating stage from its (geological) hypothesis-testing stage. We generate a full suite of tomotectonic inferences for the North American Cordillera from the slab assemblage now occupying the mantle to depths of 1800-2000 km. We reason why this assemblage originated as a completely intra-oceanic archipelago, at a time of worldwide tectonic reorganization around 200-170 Ma, when the Atlantic began to spread, and the Pacific plate was born. The Archipelago was bounded by two sets of trenches that pulled in seafloor from the east/northeast and from the southwest. On the archipelago’s western boundary, purely oceanic plate was consumed beneath intra-oceanic Farallon arcs; beneath the eastern boundary, ocean lithosphere attached to western North America was consumed, until none remained. The resulting collision between the continental margin and the eastern bounding arc (which was built on Insular Superterrane) was diachronous, commencing ~155 Ma (Nevadan orogeny), and continuing through the Sevier orogeny times. Upon collision, subduction polarity was forced to flip at the affected latitudes, so the pre-existing Farallon trench grew southward to accommodate the new kinematic requirement for eastward subduction. The new southern Farallon subduction produced arcs on the continental-margin, including the Sierra Nevada Batholith ~120-80 Ma. Slab-free areas hindcast that this Andean-type margin at U.S. latitudes did not persist beyond ~80 Ma, and that it must have been followed by a dextral transform regime, i.e., by boundary conditions conducive to large-scale terrane translations. This transform regime ended when the northern Farallon arc, still sitting offshore until ~75-50 Ma gradually collided with the margin to become the continental Cascades arc. In the northeastern boundary arcs of future Central Alaska collided with the continental margin 90-50 Ma, and then gradually collided with the northern Farallon arc. Oblique override of these two oceanic arcs produced a range of collision styles, including the Baja-BC northward sprint and the assembling of Alaska. From its combined accounting of arc override events over the past 170 Ma, tomotectonics indicates large-scale northward displacement of Insular Superterrane since its accretion, in direct and independent support for the “Baja-BC” hypothesis of paleomagnetism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→