MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401012219 · doi:10.62622/teiee.024.2.2.31-37

Occupational Health and Toxicological Risk of Exposure to Toxic Elements (TEs) in Top Soil from Residentially Situated Automobile Workshops (AWs)

2024· article· en· W4401012219 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Otoh Dayo Umoren, Omolade Ashabi Siyanbade, Abimbola O. Famuyiwa, Malik Isola Fatai, Yetambo Amuedor Yaako, Goodluck Oluchukwu Anyanwu, Livinus Ifeanyi Anyanwu, Daniel Ayodele Idowu

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Ecological and Indoor Environmental Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMunicipal Solid Waste Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental chemistryCadmiumTopsoilAtomic absorption spectroscopyEnvironmental scienceAqua regiaContaminationSoil contaminationChemistryToxicologySoil water

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Undoubtedly the biggest single cause of pollution, automobile emissions have a variety of negative occupational and human health impacts. Chemicals, paints, primers, and other hazardous products are frequently used in auto workshops' operational procedures. Substances like petrol, diesel, solvents, lubricants, and grease can be unintentionally or purposely release/exposed to the terrestrial environment. Numerous rock oil products consist of organic compounds that are capable of causing significant risk to soil, organisms, and humans due to their high toxicity. Objectives: The study aims to assess the occupational and toxicological risk of exposure to toxic elements (TEs) in topsoil from residentially situated automobile workshops (AWs) in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. Methods: 12 composite soil samples were strategically collected and transported to the laboratory. 1 g of the processed sample was digested using aqua regia, namely a mixture of nitric acid and hydrochloric acid, optimally in a molar ratio of 1:3, while toxic elements analyses were done using an atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS). Results: The result showed the presence of arsenic (As = 0.67 – 5.63 mg/kg), cadmium (Cd = 8.92 – 134 mg/kg), cobalt (Co = 6.21 – 71.22 mg/kg), nickel (Ni = 1.89 – 9.18 mg/kg), and lead (Pb = 32.6 – 211 mg/kg) in the soil. The concentrations of Cd and Pb in 66.7% and 58.3% of the sample are higher than the Canada soil guideline value (CSGV) (for Cd 22 and for Pb 140 mg/kg) respectively. Contamination factors (CF) indicate very high soil contamination from Cd and Pb, and the significant association between the TEs (Pb, Cd, Co, Ni and As) p < 0.01, suggests an emergence from an anthropogenic origin. Hazard index (HI) values for the TEs were < 1, except for Pb (27.8) in the children, indicating a significant non-cancer-related effect on exposure, while the total cancer risk (TCR) value was within the threshold limit. Conclusions: The investigated topsoil is polluted with Cd and Pb, and there is a non-cancer-related effect on children with prolonged exposure to Pb. Therefore, AWs should be cited away from residential homes, while remediation of the polluted soil should be considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrends in Ecological and Indoor Environmental EngineeringSame topicMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementFrench-language works237,207