Identification of modal parameters of soil specimen based on impact force
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study used vibration testing signals of soil samples under external loading to identify modal parameters (including natural frequencies and damping ratios) with different compaction degrees. Based on these parameters, a novel approach was proposed for reliable roadbed vibration compaction control and compaction process optimization. The experimental section utilized six soil samples with varying compaction degrees as experimental subjects, using the hammering method as the excitation mode. Subsequently, the frequency response function and modal parameters of the sample system were obtained through the acquisition, analysis, and parameter identification of samples’ acceleration signals. Firstly, samples with compaction degrees ranging from 88 % to 97 % primarily exhibited three modes, with the second modal frequency response displaying the weakest amplitude, and the fundamental mode being the dominant one. Additionally, parameter identification results revealed that the fundamental modal frequency exhibited a significant negative exponential growth with increasing compaction degree, while the second and third modal frequencies showed significant linear growth. Furthermore, the average damping ratio also demonstrated a tendency toward linear change with increasing compaction degree. Finally, the feasibility of modal parameters being actively used in practical engineering is discussed. Consequently, this study aimed to propose an indicator system for accurately assessing the bearing level of compacted soils from a modal dynamics perspective and to integrate modal dynamic indicators with density-class indicators into further optimization design work on road compaction processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".