Enhancing Model Selection by Obtaining Optimal Tuning Parameters in Elastic-Net Quantile Regression, Application to Crude Oil Prices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, there has been an increased focus on enhancing the accuracy of machine learning techniques. However, there is the possibility to improve it by selecting the optimal tuning parameters, especially when data heterogeneity and multicollinearity exist. Therefore, this study proposed a statistical model to study the importance of changing the crude oil prices in the European Union, in which it should meet state-of-the-art developments on economic, political, environmental, and social challenges. The proposed model is Elastic-net quantile regression, which provides more accurate estimations to tackle multicollinearity, heavy-tailed distributions, heterogeneity, and selecting the most significant variables. The performance has been verified by several statistical criteria. The main findings of numerical simulation and real data application confirm the superiority of the proposed Elastic-net quantile regression at the optimal tuning parameters, as it provided significant information in detecting changes in oil prices. Accordingly, based on the significant selected variables; the exchange rate has the highest influence on oil price changes at high frequencies, followed by retail trade, interest rates, and the consumer price index. The importance of this research is that policymakers take advantage of the vital importance of developing energy policies and decisions in their planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".