MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401019104 · doi:10.5753/wit.2024.2634

Uma História que está só Começando: Primeiros Passos de uma Iniciativa para Aumentar a Representatividade Feminina na Computação

2024· article· pt· W4401019104 on OpenAlexaff
Thalita Maria do Nascimento, Mayara L. de F. Neves, Heloisa Benedet Mendes, Camilla L. Assolari, Clausius Duque Gonçalves Reis, Kamila Takayama Lyra, Rachel Carlos Duque Reis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Technology in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pesquisas mostram que o número de iniciativas em Universidades brasileiras para aumentar a representatividade feminina nos cursos de computação tem crescido ano após ano e alcançado cada vez mais mulheres e meninas. Este artigo apresenta uma iniciativa pioneira no Departamento de Informática da UFPR que visa impulsionar o ingresso e a participação de mulheres, e reduzir a evasão de estudantes do sexo feminino nos cursos de computação. A iniciativa iniciou suas atividades no ano de 2023 e, desde então, vem desenvolvendo ações nos três principais eixos de atuação da Universidade: ensino, pesquisa e extensão.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGender and Technology in EducationFrench-language works237,207